Profeter og 90% drit
Tuesday, January 18th 2005
bq. Axiom #1:
"The Usenet is not the real world. The Usenet usually does not even
resemble the real world."
Corollary #1:
"Attempts to change the real world by altering the structure
of the Usenet is an attempt to work sympathetic magic -- electronic
voodoo."
Corollary #2:
"Arguing about the significance of newsgroup names and their
relation to the way people really think is equivalent to arguing
whether it is better to read tea leaves or chicken entrails to
divine the future."
Bytt ut _Usenet_ med _www_ eller _blogg_, og det er *fortsatt like riktig*. :D
bq. Axiom #2:
"Ability to type on a computer terminal is no guarantee of sanity,
intelligence, or common sense."
Corollary #3:
"An infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of keyboards
could produce something like Usenet."
Corollary #4:
"They could do a better job of it."
Fortsatt riktig. Men det gjelder også *evnen til å holde en mikrofon, eller en penn*.
bq. Axiom #3:
"Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to Usenet."
Corollary #5:
"In an unmoderated newsgroup, no one can agree on what constitutes
the 10%."
Corollary #6:
"Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too."
"Sturgeon's lov":http://www.jargon.net/jargonfile/s/SturgeonsLaw.html er like _on point_ som en elg i brunst.
Les "farvelbrevet fra Gene Spafford, a.k.a spaf, usenets første barnepike":http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.groups/msg/63926ede407972df (jeg fant det på Googles "20-års oppsummering av Usenet":http://www.google.com/googlegroups/archive_announce_20.html )